88Z.ai / RANKINGS

AI model value leaderboard

Quality versus our CNY list price when available, or Artificial Analysis’s published cost per task. Prices and benchmark scores come from different sources and should be read separately.

Last collected by this site: 2026-11-14 06:41 (UTC+8, Asia/Shanghai). Source publication dates are in the table or the citations below.

Quality versus our CNY list price when available, or Artificial Analysis’s published cost per task. Prices and benchmark scores come from different sources and should be read separately.

117 model families (best published variant per family)

Click a column header to sort. The table is fully server-rendered and remains readable without JavaScript.

#ModelValue scoreQualityOur blended CNY price (3:1)AA cost / task (USD)
1Gemini 4 CarbonGoogle92.796.0¥34.4—
2GPT 6.1 TerraOpenAI91.689.5¥17.2—
3Muse Spark 1.3 (Max)Meta91.589.3¥17.2—
4Gemini 3.7 Flash (High)Google89.985.9¥12.9—
5GPT 6.1 SolOpenAI89.691.6¥34.4—
6GLM 5.2 (Max)zai88.984.9¥14.67—
7GPT 5 (High)OpenAI88.788.9¥29.56—
8Gemini 3.6 Flash (High)Google88.183.2¥12.9—
9Muse Spark 1.1Meta87.884.0¥17.2—
10Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle87.889.0¥34.4—
11Muse Spark 1.2 (xHigh)Meta87.683.8¥17.2—
12GLM 5Z-AI87.582.5¥13.33—
13DeepSeek R1 0528DeepSeek87.480.7¥7.85—
14Hy3Tencent87.478.8¥1.24—
15Gemini 4 Hydrogen (High)Google87.385.9¥25.81.87
16Kimi K3 (Max)Moonshot87.188.4¥35.64—
17Mimo v2.5 Proxiaomi86.778.9¥4.68—
18DeepSeek v4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeek86.577.6¥1.32—
19Kimi k2.6Moonshot85.879.5¥11.52—
20Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh)Anthropic85.585.8¥34.44.09
21DeepSeek v3.2DeepSeek85.276.2¥2.49—
22Grok 4.6 (High)xAI85.082.6¥25.8—
23Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic85.095.0¥68.8—
24GPT 6 Sol (Max)OpenAI84.784.7¥34.4—
25GLM 5.1zai84.579.8¥18.49—
26Grok 4.5xAI84.281.5¥25.8—
27GLM 4.5Z.ai83.976.0¥8.6—
28MiniMax m2.5MiniMax83.974.6¥3.78—
29DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek83.876.1¥9.03—
30qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba83.875.3¥6.29—
31Kimi k2.5 (Thinking)Moonshot83.475.4¥8.6—
32Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Google83.481.3¥29.03—
33Beam 1.0 501b A23breflection83.373.9¥4.09—
34GPT 5.4OpenAI83.376.9¥14.51—
35Mimo v2.5xiaomi82.273.2¥6.88—
36GLM 4.7zai82.273.6¥8.6—
37GLM 4.6Z.ai82.073.1¥7.52—
38Gemma 4 26b A4bGoogle82.071.1¥0.92—
39Claude Sonnet 5 (High)Anthropic81.880.5¥34.4—
40DeepSeek V3 0324DeepSeek81.871.8¥4.32—
41Claude Haiku 5.5Anthropic81.670.8¥1.72—
42GLM 5.3 (Max)Zhipu81.572.5¥8.285.01
43qwen3.5 397b A17bAlibaba81.072.7¥11.61—
44GPT 5.4 Mini (High)OpenAI80.573.0¥14.51—
45Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle80.479.8¥38.7—
46MiniMax m2.7MiniMax80.469.4¥3.16—
47GPT 5.1OpenAI80.276.9¥29.56—
48Gemini 3.8 Flash (High)Google80.072.2¥14.197.77
49GPT 5.2OpenAI79.979.8¥41.39—
50Hy3 PreviewTencent79.167.5¥2.45—
51Grok 4.3xAI79.070.4¥13.44—
52qwen3.5 122b A10bAlibaba78.968.2¥6.15—
53GPT 5.6 TerraOpenAI78.577.1¥38.7—
54Claude Sonnet 4.6Anthropic78.580.8¥51.6—
55GPT 6 Luna (Max)OpenAI78.165.8¥1.720.15
56Claude Opus 5 (Max)Anthropic78.190.2¥86—
57qwen3.5 27bAlibaba78.067.3¥7.27—
58Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewGoogle77.666.0¥4.84—
59Inkling 2 SmallThinking Machines77.565.6¥4.091.18
60Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle77.572.9¥29.56—
61Mimo v2.6 Flash小米集团77.564.8¥1.510.13
62qwen3.8 27bAlibaba77.465.8¥5.0—
63Mimo v2.6 Pro小米集团77.365.5¥4.680.26
64DeepSeek v3.2 ExpDeepSeek77.364.9¥2.62—
65Grok 4.7 (xHigh)xAI77.271.5¥25.87.77
66GLM 5.3 FlashZhipu76.663.3¥0.430.58
67Mistral Large 4 0Mistral76.165.1¥9.03—
68Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle76.064.5¥7.31—
69Qwen3 32bAlibaba75.862.4¥1.12—
70Muse Wonder (Max)Meta75.681.7¥68.86.95
71Claude Opus 4.6 (High)Anthropic75.185.9¥86—
72Claude Opus 4.7 (High)Anthropic75.085.9¥86—
73qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba74.961.1¥0.98—
74qwen3.5 35b A3bAlibaba74.661.2¥3.05—
75Kimi k3.1 ProMoonshot73.668.8¥34.43.68
76Claude Opus 4.8 (High)Anthropic73.583.7¥86—
77GPT Oss 120bOpenAI71.957.1¥2.26—
78Step 5 Preview阶跃星辰71.759.8¥12.252.35
79MiniMax M3稀宇科技70.856.2¥4.521.29
80qwen3.8 Max 0902阿里巴巴70.561.9¥25.810.02
81MiniMax m3.1 Flash稀宇科技70.354.5¥1.130.49
82Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGoogle68.653.9¥7.310.69
83Mistral Large 4Mistral68.354.0¥9.03—
84Inklingthinky67.955.2¥15.16—
85Claude Fable 5.2Anthropic67.990.6¥137.6—
86Gemma 3 27b ItGoogle67.250.1¥1.27—
87Inkling SmallThinking Machines66.850.8¥5.480.2
88Solar Pro 4Upstage66.148.8¥2.260.96
89Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic6596.5¥172—
90GPT 6 AstraOpenAI65.096.5¥172—
91GPT 4o Mini 2024 07 18OpenAI62.643.9¥2.26—
92GPT 4o 2024 08 06OpenAI62.153.4¥37.63—
93qwen2.5 Coder 32b InstructAlibaba60.141.5¥6.41—
94Claude Fable 5 (High)Anthropic59.989.2¥172—
95Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral57.643.6¥25.81.04
96Muse Ember (Max)Meta57.236¥1.720.14
97Tencent Hy4Tencent55.735¥5.381.03
98Granite 4.2 8bIBM54.331.7¥0.920.04
99GPT 6.1 Terra Non ReasoningOpenAI53.931—0.23
100Gemma 4 31bGoogle53.831.3¥2.15—
101Muse Spark OpenMeta53.535.3¥17.2—
102Ling 3.1 Flash 1019InclusionAI52.630—3.19
103qwen3.8 Flash NextAlibaba52.529—0.57
104Agnes 2.5 Pro ThetaSapiens AI49.024—0.57
105DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Max)DeepSeek46.323¥10.261.77
106DeepSeek v4.1 Flash 1017 Non ReasoningDeepSeek45.519—0.43
107Beam 1.0Reflection44.818—0.28
108Apodex 1.1Apodex41.914—0.76
109Nemotron 3.5 Super VlNVIDIA41.614¥1.980.52
110DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 Non ReasoningDeepSeek41.113—0.98
111Nemotron 3 UltraNVIDIA38.812¥9.032.23
112GPT 6 Luna Non ReasoningOpenAI38.59—0.07
113qwen3.8 27b Non ReasoningAlibaba38.510—3.77
114Muse Glimmer (High)Meta36.46—0.17
115Nemotron 3.5 LightningNVIDIA36.26¥0.880.31
116Command A+Cohere35.46¥5.160
117Mistral Small 4Mistral34.64¥2.260.04

The value score combines normalized quality (65%) and normalized cost (35%, lower is better). Site prices are CNY point list rates; AA costs are a third-party USD-per-task figure and are not the same thing.

Sources

FAQ

Where do these scores come from?
Every score comes from a public benchmark or official machine-readable file, with a source link and date. This site does not invent scores, and missing values are not treated as zero.
How is the overall score calculated?
Each source is min-max normalized within itself, then weighted: Artificial Analysis 28%, LMArena Text Arena 28%, LiveBench 22%, coding composite 15%, reasoning composite 7%. Missing sources are dropped and the rest are renormalized. A model needs at least two headline sources (or three partials) to enter the overall board. When several variants of one family exist, only the best overall variant is shown.
Are site prices part of the benchmarks?
No. Benchmark scores come from third-party public boards. CNY prices are this site’s catalogue reference rates (CNY 1 = 1,000 points) and are settled on actual usage. They are shown separately so billing is not confused with quality.
How often is this updated?
A collector runs automatically every day. The upstream boards may not publish a new snapshot daily, so each page shows both this site’s collection time and the source publication date.